Immigrants from Guatemala vs Danish Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Danish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Danes
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Danish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,228,850 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,084,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.29%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Danish |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 59.3% |
| Range | 24.7% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 14.4% |
| Median | 12.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Danes by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |