Immigrants from Belarus vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Lebanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Lebanese
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
66.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Lebanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,495,735 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.18%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Lebanese |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 19.6% | 27.5% |
| Range | 19.0% | 25.3% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 8.4% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Lebanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |