Immigrants from China vs Korean Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Korean
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Koreans
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Korean Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,841,440 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Korean |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 21.7% |
| Range | 29.4% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| Median | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Koreans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Arapaho (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Albanian (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |