Immigrants from Cambodia vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Brazilians
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,141,763 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.82% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 7.3% |
| Range | 14.4% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 3.1% |
| Median | 3.2% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia and Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |