Burmese vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Indian (Asian)
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Indians (Asian)
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 12.9% |
| Range | 22.5% | 12.4% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Indians (Asian) by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |