Fijian vs Irish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Fijian
Irish
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Fijians
Irish
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Irish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,581,803 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 4.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | Irish |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 7.6% | 42.5% |
| Range | 5.1% | 41.5% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 7.0% |
| Median | 4.1% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Irish by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |