Fijian vs Danish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Fijian
Danish
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Fijians
Danes
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Danish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,961,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 0.72%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | Danish |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 7.6% | 49.1% |
| Range | 5.1% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 7.7% |
| Median | 4.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Danes by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |