Fijian vs Hmong Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Fijian
Hmong
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Fijians
Hmong
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Hmong Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,680,511 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 2.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Fijian | Hmong |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 7.6% | 8.3% |
| Range | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 3.7% |
| Median | 4.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Hmong by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ute (3.5%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and Slovene (3.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |