Egyptian vs Afghan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Egyptian
Afghan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Egyptians
Afghans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Afghan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,859,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,854,459 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian | Afghan |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 9.5% | 9.8% |
Range | 6.6% | 9.3% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Afghans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Japan (5.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bulgarian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |