Czechoslovakian vs Scandinavian Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Scandinavian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Scandinavians
12.5%
DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Scandinavian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,659,957 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,547,672 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.77%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Scandinavian |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 47.1% |
| Range | 45.5% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 17.2% |
| Median | 15.2% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Scandinavians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Spaniard (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), U.S. Virgin Islander (12.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Bangladeshi (12.6%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Liberia (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Canadian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Slavic (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Laos (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Slavs | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Canadians | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Scandinavians | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.5% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.7% |