Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Central America Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Central America
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Central America
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Central America Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,995,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 0.72%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 14.7% |
| Range | 8.2% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Central America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |