Costa Rican vs Chilean Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
 Chilean
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Chileans
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Chilean Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,564,903 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,654,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.15%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Chilean | 
| Minimum | 5.6% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 24.1% | 22.9% | 
| Range | 18.5% | 21.3% | 
| Mean | 15.4% | 14.9% | 
| Median | 15.5% | 15.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 17.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Chileans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Scotch-Irish (17.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are French (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% | 
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |