Costa Rican vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
New Zealander
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
New Zealanders
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,564,903 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 24.1% | 37.6% |
| Range | 18.5% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Median | 15.5% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Scotch-Irish (17.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (17.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Haiti (17.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | France | 29.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 27.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 27.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 27.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.4% |
| Delaware | 25.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.4% |
| New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
| Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
| Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
| South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |