Chinese vs Spaniard Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
 Spaniard
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chinese
Spaniards
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Spaniard Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,300,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.50%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Spaniard | 
| Minimum | 0.26% | 2.3% | 
| Maximum | 17.0% | 25.6% | 
| Range | 16.8% | 23.3% | 
| Mean | 7.3% | 9.0% | 
| Median | 6.6% | 8.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 6.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 10.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 4.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 4.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Spaniards by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are German (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256  | Tragic 6.5%  |