Chinese vs Bahamian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Bahamian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chinese
Bahamians
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Bahamian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,670,822 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 17.0% | 27.8% |
| Range | 16.8% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 7.4% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Bahamians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Nepalese (6.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Guyanese (6.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (6.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and English (6.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.6% |
| English | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |