Chinese vs Polish Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Polish
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chinese
Poles
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Polish Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,456,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.21%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Polish |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 63.9% |
| Range | 26.0% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 15.6% |
| Median | 12.3% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Poles by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |