Chinese vs Immigrants from Dominica Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Dominica
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Dominica
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Dominica Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,793,635 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Dominica |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 21.5% |
| Range | 26.0% | 19.4% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 12.5% |
| Median | 12.3% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Dominica by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Slovene (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), German Russian (12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Belgian (12.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Bermudan (12.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |