Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,750 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 51.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 29.9% |
Range | 49.5% | 27.6% |
Mean | 23.7% | 11.7% |
Median | 21.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Vietnamese | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Maltese | 94.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Estonians | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 94.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |