Immigrants from Chile vs Uruguayan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Uruguayan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Uruguayans
10.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Uruguayan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,587,617 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 42.9% |
Range | 32.0% | 39.1% |
Mean | 9.9% | 14.9% |
Median | 8.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Uruguayans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Latvia (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Mongolian (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |