Chickasaw vs Yuman Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yuman
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Yuman
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yuman Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,643 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 3.8%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yuman |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 37.0% |
| Range | 43.9% | 33.4% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 18.4% |
| Median | 20.7% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Yuman by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |