Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,619,096 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.88%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 16.1% |
| Maximum | 62.8% | 45.8% |
| Range | 56.3% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 27.4% | 28.6% |
| Median | 27.9% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.9% | 26.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.3% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |