Celtic vs Sioux Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Sioux
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Celtics
Sioux
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Sioux Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,862,473 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,119,186 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 0.090%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Sioux |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 15.2% |
| Range | 48.7% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 7.3% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Sioux by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.17%), White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |