Immigrants from Scotland vs South African Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,606 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,548,455 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.62%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Scotland	South African
Minimum	1.3%	0.50%
Maximum	66.1%	19.9%
Range	64.9%	19.4%
Mean	14.1%	9.8%
Median	10.5%	9.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.1%	6.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	12.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.4%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.3%	4.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and South Africans by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Ecuadorian (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Albania (10.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Estonians	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 10.6%
Albanians	94.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	94.1 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	94.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 10.6%
South Africans	93.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 10.7%
Ecuadorians	93.1 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Syria	93.0 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	92.8 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Albania	92.5 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	92.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	92.5 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 10.7%
Greeks	92.3 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 10.7%
Salvadorans	91.9 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	91.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 10.7%
Costa Ricans	91.4 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Scotland	91.3 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 10.7%
Australians	90.7 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 10.8%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	90.6 /100 \| #142	Exceptional 10.8%
Sierra Leoneans	89.7 /100 \| #143	Excellent 10.8%
Lithuanians	88.7 /100 \| #144	Excellent 10.8%