Arab vs South African Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Arab
South African
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Arabs
South Africans
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs South African Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,294,602 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,548,455 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | South African |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 48.5% | 19.9% |
| Range | 45.5% | 19.4% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 9.8% |
| Median | 11.4% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and South Africans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Lithuanian (10.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Ecuadorian (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Albania (10.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants (10.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |