Brazilian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,696,465 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,797,578 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.37%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Brazilian	Immigrants from Netherlands
Minimum	1.7%	1.7%
Maximum	51.9%	39.6%
Range	50.2%	37.9%
Mean	11.6%	11.1%
Median	10.1%	9.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.8%	7.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.6%	13.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.8%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.6%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.5%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Netherlands by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Morocco (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Morocco (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Immigrants \| Ukraine	97.9 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Austria	97.8 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 10.4%
Macedonians	97.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Hungary	97.6 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 10.4%
Zimbabweans	97.4 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 10.4%
Ethiopians	97.4 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	97.2 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 10.5%
Koreans	97.1 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 10.5%
Brazilians	96.9 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 10.5%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	96.8 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 10.5%
Tongans	96.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	96.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	96.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	95.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	95.5 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 10.6%
Luxembourgers	95.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 10.6%
Vietnamese	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 10.6%
Romanians	95.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Norway	95.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 10.6%
Maltese	94.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 10.6%