Brazilian vs Central American Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Central American
Disability
Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Central Americans
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Central American Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,954,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,498,688 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.490 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.040%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Central American |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 16.3% |
| Range | 21.8% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 9.9% |
| Median | 11.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Central Americans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |