Brazilian vs Ugandan Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
 Ugandan
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Ugandans
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Ugandan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,954,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.74%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Ugandan | 
| Minimum | 1.7% | 4.7% | 
| Maximum | 23.5% | 25.9% | 
| Range | 21.8% | 21.2% | 
| Mean | 11.9% | 12.1% | 
| Median | 11.3% | 11.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 9.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Ugandans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and South African (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Arab (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% | 
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% | 
| Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% | 
| New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |