Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Jordan
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,486,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,274,102 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%.

Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 28.3% | 17.5% |
Range | 26.9% | 14.3% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.6% |