Bhutanese vs Chilean Female Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chilean
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Chileans
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Chilean Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,486,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,651,441 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 28.3% | 26.7% |
| Range | 26.9% | 21.8% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 11.7% |
| Median | 11.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Chileans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |