Basque vs Czech Male Disability
COMPARE
Basque
Czech
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Basques
Czechs
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Czech Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,777,747 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,720,527 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%.

Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Czech |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 51.7% | 45.8% |
| Range | 46.6% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 15.3% |
| Median | 13.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Czechs by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Belgian (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), European (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Chinese (12.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and British (12.1%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Bahamian (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Italian (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Northern European (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (11.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Laos (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
| British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |