Australian vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Slavic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Slavs
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,841,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 10.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Slavic |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 56.8% |
| Range | 13.3% | 56.3% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 9.9% |
| Median | 6.1% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |