Argentinean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Disability
COMPARE
Argentinean
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Argentineans
Immigrants from Hong Kong
11.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,133,447 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,994,726 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 3.8%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 18.1% |
| Range | 20.4% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 10.0% |
| Median | 10.2% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Asia (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Korea (10.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Israel (10.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Iranian (10.6%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |