Argentinean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Argentinean
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Argentineans
Immigrants from Hong Kong
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,580,968 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 13.8% |
| Range | 15.2% | 12.9% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |