Arab vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Disability
COMPARE
Arab
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Disability
Disability Comparison
Arabs
Immigrants from Costa Rica
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,795,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.64%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 68.2% | 23.1% |
| Range | 65.2% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 11.0% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Africa (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |