Alaskan Athabascan vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Zimbabwean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Zimbabweans
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 60.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 6.8% |
| Range | 16.4% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 2.1% |
| Median | 3.5% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |