Alaskan Athabascan vs Central American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Central American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Central American Indians
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Central American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,060,213 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 3.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Central American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.79% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 19.1% |
| Range | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Median | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Central American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Cajun (3.1%, a difference of 0.45%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and Apache (3.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |