Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
 Zimbabwean
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Zimbabweans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,170,588 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.49%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean | 
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.38% | 
| Maximum | 3.5% | 6.8% | 
| Range | 3.3% | 6.4% | 
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 1.8% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.62% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.65% | 1.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.64% | 1.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Zimbabweans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |