Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Africa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Africa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Africa
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Africa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,780,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 46.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 4.2% |
| Range | 16.4% | 4.0% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 2.1% |
| Median | 3.5% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 0.50% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 0.70% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |