Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Macedonian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Macedonian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Macedonians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Macedonian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,421,317 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,627,302 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Macedonian |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 5.1% | 4.5% |
Range | 4.6% | 4.4% |
Mean | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.91% | 0.73% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.90% | 0.73% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Macedonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |