Alaskan Athabascan vs Lumbee Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Lumbee
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Lumbee
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Lumbee Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,274,524 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 29.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Lumbee |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.45% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 9.7% |
Range | 22.1% | 9.2% |
Mean | 9.0% | 4.9% |
Median | 7.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Lumbee by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |