Immigrants from Central America vs Blackfeet Disability Age 65 to 74

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 534,691,138 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,087,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 26.6%, a difference of 0.16%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Central America	Blackfeet
Minimum	10.7%	10.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	89.3%	89.8%
Mean	32.6%	36.1%
Median	28.4%	32.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.8%	25.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.4%	44.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.6%	19.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.1%	18.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.1%	18.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Dominican (26.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Hispanic or Latino (26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Bangladeshi (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Spanish American Indian (26.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (26.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Dominican (26.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (26.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Spanish American Indian (26.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Bangladeshi (26.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (26.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Delaware	0.1 /100 \| #282	Tragic 25.9%
Spanish Americans	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 25.9%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 26.0%
Immigrants \| Congo	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 26.0%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 26.1%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 26.1%
Mexican American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 26.2%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 26.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 26.3%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 26.4%
Blackfeet	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 26.6%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 26.6%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 26.7%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 26.7%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 26.8%
Fijians	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 27.0%
Potawatomi	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 27.0%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 27.1%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 27.1%