Hmong vs Arab 10th Grade
COMPARE
Hmong
Arab
10th Grade
10th Grade Comparison
Hmong
Arabs
94.1%
10TH GRADE
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
94.0%
10TH GRADE
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Arab 10th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,672,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 94.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,870,847 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022 and weighted average of 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%.
10th Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Arab |
| Minimum | 89.3% | 68.2% |
| Maximum | 99.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 9.9% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 95.0% | 93.0% |
| Median | 95.6% | 94.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 94.1% | 92.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 96.7% | 96.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Arabs by 10th Grade
In terms of 10th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Albanian (94.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Jordan (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Ugandan (94.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Kenyan (94.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 10th Grade |
| Osage | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Shoshone | 90.8 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Arapaho | 90.5 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 89.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Hmong | 86.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Cherokee | 84.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Chickasaw | 82.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 81.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Arabs | 80.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Ugandans | 80.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Egyptians | 79.6 /100 | #150 | Good 94.0% |
| Kenyans | 79.1 /100 | #151 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 94.0% |