Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.6811669.8%33.9%(+35.9)#333.4%(+36.4)#175
2.6811255.1%33.9%(+21.2)#9333.4%(+21.7)#2,871
3.6816452.0%33.9%(+18.1)#11933.4%(+18.6)#3,838
4.6811851.3%33.9%(+17.4)#12533.4%(+17.9)#4,094
5.6813748.5%33.9%(+14.6)#14833.4%(+15.1)#5,068
6.6812248.5%33.9%(+14.6)#14933.4%(+15.1)#5,076
7.6813445.1%33.9%(+11.2)#17933.4%(+11.7)#6,367
8.6813644.6%33.9%(+10.7)#18533.4%(+11.2)#6,542
9.6813543.5%33.9%(+9.60)#19233.4%(+10.1)#6,966
10.6810441.1%33.9%(+7.20)#21033.4%(+7.70)#7,915
11.6812736.8%33.9%(+2.90)#23733.4%(+3.40)#9,749
12.6813233.4%33.9%(-0.500)#25633.4%(=0.000)#11,224
13.6815433.2%33.9%(-0.700)#25833.4%(-0.200)#11,301
14.6814432.6%33.9%(-1.30)#26233.4%(-0.800)#11,546
15.6811729.8%33.9%(-4.10)#27933.4%(-3.60)#12,679
16.6810529.1%33.9%(-4.80)#28133.4%(-4.30)#12,935
17.6813128.9%33.9%(-5.00)#28233.4%(-4.50)#13,011
18.6810228.3%33.9%(-5.60)#28633.4%(-5.10)#13,255
19.6810827.8%33.9%(-6.10)#28833.4%(-5.60)#13,418
20.6813026.5%33.9%(-7.40)#29833.4%(-6.90)#13,871
21.6811025.7%33.9%(-8.20)#30033.4%(-7.70)#14,101
22.6811424.1%33.9%(-9.80)#30933.4%(-9.30)#14,547
23.6810723.4%33.9%(-10.5)#31333.4%(-10.00)#14,783
24.6810621.9%33.9%(-12.0)#31833.4%(-11.5)#15,306
25.6812421.0%33.9%(-12.9)#32333.4%(-12.4)#15,794
26.6818220.5%33.9%(-13.4)#32833.4%(-12.9)#16,119
27.6817820.0%33.9%(-13.9)#32933.4%(-13.4)#16,267
28.6811119.8%33.9%(-14.1)#33133.4%(-13.6)#16,336

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE are:
#1
69.8%
#2
55.1%
#3
52.0%
#4
51.3%
#5
48.5%
#6
48.5%
#7
45.1%
#8
44.6%
#9
43.5%
#10
41.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
68116 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE with 69.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha is 27.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska is 33.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.