Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha

0.0%
20.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1.6811018.5%3.3%(+15.2)#144.5%(+14.0)#1,582
2.6811117.6%3.3%(+14.3)#164.5%(+13.2)#1,718
3.6810813.9%3.3%(+10.6)#294.5%(+9.41)#2,616
4.6810710.9%3.3%(+7.63)#424.5%(+6.47)#3,994
5.681058.6%3.3%(+5.27)#714.5%(+4.10)#5,785
6.681316.7%3.3%(+3.36)#954.5%(+2.20)#8,190
7.681576.0%3.3%(+2.72)#1094.5%(+1.56)#9,230
8.681175.9%3.3%(+2.55)#1204.5%(+1.39)#9,571
9.681125.6%3.3%(+2.31)#1284.5%(+1.14)#10,033
10.681045.3%3.3%(+1.99)#1364.5%(+0.827)#10,686
11.681345.1%3.3%(+1.77)#1444.5%(+0.604)#11,170
12.681273.9%3.3%(+0.643)#1934.5%(-0.521)#13,927
13.681373.9%3.3%(+0.601)#1964.5%(-0.563)#14,059
14.681543.2%3.3%(-0.091)#2384.5%(-1.26)#16,163
15.681242.4%3.3%(-0.926)#2884.5%(-2.09)#19,024
16.681642.0%3.3%(-1.27)#3054.5%(-2.44)#20,344
17.681161.9%3.3%(-1.44)#3144.5%(-2.60)#20,927
18.681441.8%3.3%(-1.51)#3174.5%(-2.68)#21,245
19.681141.6%3.3%(-1.74)#3334.5%(-2.90)#22,126
20.681021.4%3.3%(-1.85)#3434.5%(-3.01)#22,499
21.681061.4%3.3%(-1.86)#3454.5%(-3.03)#22,542
22.681321.4%3.3%(-1.94)#3494.5%(-3.11)#22,806
23.681521.3%3.3%(-1.95)#3544.5%(-3.12)#22,848
24.681380.97%3.3%(-2.33)#3834.5%(-3.49)#24,081
25.681420.97%3.3%(-2.33)#3844.5%(-3.49)#24,082
26.681220.87%3.3%(-2.42)#3884.5%(-3.59)#24,379
27.681360.71%3.3%(-2.58)#4014.5%(-3.75)#24,819
28.681300.71%3.3%(-2.59)#4024.5%(-3.75)#24,832
29.681350.62%3.3%(-2.68)#4124.5%(-3.85)#25,079
30.681180.33%3.3%(-2.97)#4284.5%(-4.13)#25,638

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE are:
#1
18.5%
#2
17.6%
#3
13.9%
#4
10.9%
#5
8.6%
#6
6.7%
#7
6.0%
#8
5.9%
#9
5.6%
#10
5.3%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
68110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE with 18.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Omaha is 4.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Nebraska is 3.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.