Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha

0.0%
50.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.6810840.4%22.5%(+17.9)#10724.1%(+16.4)#5,612
2.6811140.2%22.5%(+17.7)#10824.1%(+16.2)#5,667
3.6813137.0%22.5%(+14.5)#12224.1%(+12.9)#6,715
4.6810529.5%22.5%(+7.04)#16724.1%(+5.47)#9,740
5.6810229.1%22.5%(+6.56)#17324.1%(+4.99)#9,992
6.6811027.7%22.5%(+5.18)#18024.1%(+3.61)#10,695
7.6811225.7%22.5%(+3.19)#18924.1%(+1.62)#11,729
8.6810724.3%22.5%(+1.76)#20324.1%(+0.191)#12,535
9.6813424.0%22.5%(+1.48)#20724.1%(-0.093)#12,691
10.6810423.1%22.5%(+0.629)#21024.1%(-0.941)#13,167
11.6815721.9%22.5%(-0.632)#22024.1%(-2.20)#13,921
12.6813821.1%22.5%(-1.41)#22424.1%(-2.98)#14,335
13.6814417.8%22.5%(-4.67)#25324.1%(-6.24)#16,184
14.6812417.7%22.5%(-4.82)#25424.1%(-6.39)#16,280
15.6816415.3%22.5%(-7.23)#27424.1%(-8.80)#17,721
16.6815215.3%22.5%(-7.24)#27524.1%(-8.81)#17,730
17.6812215.1%22.5%(-7.40)#27724.1%(-8.97)#17,813
18.6813612.6%22.5%(-9.92)#28924.1%(-11.5)#19,267
19.6812712.2%22.5%(-10.3)#29124.1%(-11.8)#19,493
20.6815411.6%22.5%(-10.9)#29224.1%(-12.4)#19,826
21.6810611.4%22.5%(-11.1)#29324.1%(-12.7)#19,945
22.6813510.3%22.5%(-12.2)#30324.1%(-13.8)#20,602
23.681147.2%22.5%(-15.3)#31724.1%(-16.9)#22,153
24.681166.8%22.5%(-15.7)#31924.1%(-17.3)#22,336
25.681305.5%22.5%(-17.0)#32524.1%(-18.6)#22,952
26.681324.6%22.5%(-17.9)#33224.1%(-19.5)#23,260
27.681174.2%22.5%(-18.3)#33324.1%(-19.9)#23,401
28.681422.3%22.5%(-20.2)#34524.1%(-21.8)#23,891
29.681372.2%22.5%(-20.3)#34724.1%(-21.9)#23,921

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE are:
#1
40.4%
#2
40.2%
#3
37.0%
#4
29.5%
#5
29.1%
#6
27.7%
#7
25.7%
#8
24.3%
#9
24.0%
#10
23.1%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE?
68108 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE with 40.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Omaha is 21.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska is 22.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.