Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Birth Rate | Below Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha

150.0
0.0
Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1.6813127.062.0(-35.0)#6953.0(-26.0)#4,005
2.6810628.062.0(-34.0)#7253.0(-25.0)#4,258
3.6813631.062.0(-31.0)#8353.0(-22.0)#5,099
4.6810242.062.0(-20.0)#12053.0(-11.0)#8,812
5.6814444.062.0(-18.0)#12953.0(-9.00)#9,434
6.6813846.062.0(-16.0)#13653.0(-7.00)#10,270
7.6815449.062.0(-13.0)#14653.0(-4.00)#11,215
8.6811850.062.0(-12.0)#15153.0(-3.00)#11,659
9.6811653.062.0(-9.00)#16153.0(=0.000)#12,533
10.6813254.062.0(-8.00)#16553.0(+1.000)#12,960
11.6811157.062.0(-5.00)#17653.0(+4.00)#13,846
12.6812259.062.0(-3.00)#18953.0(+6.00)#14,501
13.6813760.062.0(-2.00)#19453.0(+7.00)#14,747
14.6813468.062.0(+6.00)#22653.0(+15.0)#16,881
15.6816468.062.0(+6.00)#22753.0(+15.0)#16,882
16.6812470.062.0(+8.00)#23253.0(+17.0)#17,346
17.6813571.062.0(+9.00)#24053.0(+18.0)#17,515
18.6813072.062.0(+10.00)#24353.0(+19.0)#17,763
19.6811773.062.0(+11.0)#24853.0(+20.0)#17,998
20.6814274.062.0(+12.0)#25553.0(+21.0)#18,236
21.6811075.062.0(+13.0)#25653.0(+22.0)#18,382
22.6810576.062.0(+14.0)#26253.0(+23.0)#18,532
23.6810477.062.0(+15.0)#26453.0(+24.0)#18,679
24.6811477.062.0(+15.0)#26553.0(+24.0)#18,710
25.6810779.062.0(+17.0)#27053.0(+26.0)#19,019
26.6815779.062.0(+17.0)#27253.0(+26.0)#19,089
27.6812796.062.0(+34.0)#29853.0(+43.0)#21,085
28.6815298.062.0(+36.0)#30153.0(+45.0)#21,293
29.68108101.062.0(+39.0)#30953.0(+48.0)#21,545
30.68112141.062.0(+79.0)#37053.0(+88.0)#23,467

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE are:
#1
27.0
#2
28.0
#3
31.0
#4
42.0
#5
44.0
#6
46.0
#7
49.0
#8
50.0
#9
53.0
#10
54.0
What zip code has the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
68131 has the Fewest Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE with 27.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha is 65.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Nebraska?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Nebraska is 62.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in the United States?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in the United States is 53.0.