Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Birth Rate | Below Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha

0.0
150.0
Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1.68112141.062.0(+79.0)#6553.0(+88.0)#1,961
2.68108101.062.0(+39.0)#12453.0(+48.0)#3,873
3.6815298.062.0(+36.0)#13353.0(+45.0)#4,123
4.6812796.062.0(+34.0)#13753.0(+43.0)#4,289
5.6810779.062.0(+17.0)#16253.0(+26.0)#6,304
6.6815779.062.0(+17.0)#16453.0(+26.0)#6,374
7.6810477.062.0(+15.0)#16853.0(+24.0)#6,613
8.6811477.062.0(+15.0)#16953.0(+24.0)#6,644
9.6810576.062.0(+14.0)#17253.0(+23.0)#6,819
10.6811075.062.0(+13.0)#17453.0(+22.0)#7,023
11.6814274.062.0(+12.0)#18153.0(+21.0)#7,250
12.6811773.062.0(+11.0)#18353.0(+20.0)#7,428
13.6813072.062.0(+10.00)#18953.0(+19.0)#7,617
14.6813571.062.0(+9.00)#19453.0(+18.0)#7,797
15.6812470.062.0(+8.00)#19753.0(+17.0)#8,042
16.6813468.062.0(+6.00)#20553.0(+15.0)#8,439
17.6816468.062.0(+6.00)#20653.0(+15.0)#8,440
18.6813760.062.0(-2.00)#24053.0(+7.00)#10,593
19.6812259.062.0(-3.00)#24553.0(+6.00)#10,942
20.6811157.062.0(-5.00)#25553.0(+4.00)#11,503
21.6813254.062.0(-8.00)#26653.0(+1.000)#12,487
22.6811653.062.0(-9.00)#27153.0(=0.000)#12,699
23.6811850.062.0(-12.0)#28053.0(-3.00)#13,837
24.6815449.062.0(-13.0)#28553.0(-4.00)#14,101
25.6813846.062.0(-16.0)#29953.0(-7.00)#15,242
26.6814444.062.0(-18.0)#30453.0(-9.00)#15,857
27.6810242.062.0(-20.0)#31253.0(-11.0)#16,697
28.6813631.062.0(-31.0)#35053.0(-22.0)#20,223
29.6810628.062.0(-34.0)#36253.0(-25.0)#21,083
30.6813127.062.0(-35.0)#36453.0(-26.0)#21,342

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE are:
#1
141.0
#2
101.0
#3
98.0
#4
96.0
#5
79.0
#6
79.0
#7
77.0
#8
77.0
#9
76.0
#10
75.0
What zip code has the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
68112 has the Most Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE with 141.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha, NE?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Omaha is 65.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Nebraska?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in Nebraska is 62.0.
What is the Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in the United States?
Number of Births per 1,000 Women Below Poverty Level in the United States is 53.0.