Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1.6811468.0%34.4%(+33.6)#138.5%(+29.5)#45
2.6811058.1%34.4%(+23.7)#438.5%(+19.6)#466
3.6810754.0%34.4%(+19.6)#738.5%(+15.5)#922
4.6813451.8%34.4%(+17.4)#938.5%(+13.3)#1,227
5.6811746.9%34.4%(+12.5)#1138.5%(+8.40)#2,236
6.6811845.6%34.4%(+11.2)#1238.5%(+7.10)#2,563
7.6814441.4%34.4%(+7.00)#1538.5%(+2.90)#3,731
8.6812441.3%34.4%(+6.90)#1638.5%(+2.80)#3,766
9.6810541.0%34.4%(+6.60)#1738.5%(+2.50)#3,832
10.6811135.7%34.4%(+1.30)#2238.5%(-2.80)#5,495
11.6810835.1%34.4%(+0.700)#2338.5%(-3.40)#5,677
12.6810231.9%34.4%(-2.50)#2638.5%(-6.60)#6,471
13.6813131.3%34.4%(-3.10)#2738.5%(-7.20)#6,608
14.6813229.7%34.4%(-4.70)#2838.5%(-8.80)#6,939
15.6815227.4%34.4%(-7.00)#2938.5%(-11.1)#7,288
16.6810626.3%34.4%(-8.10)#3038.5%(-12.2)#7,438
17.6810426.0%34.4%(-8.40)#3138.5%(-12.5)#7,460
18.6811222.3%34.4%(-12.1)#3738.5%(-16.2)#7,879
19.6817822.3%34.4%(-12.1)#3838.5%(-16.2)#7,882
20.6818219.9%34.4%(-14.5)#4138.5%(-18.6)#8,061
21.6813718.9%34.4%(-15.5)#4238.5%(-19.6)#8,125

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE are:
#1
68.0%
#2
58.1%
#3
54.0%
#4
51.8%
#5
46.9%
#6
45.6%
#7
41.4%
#8
41.3%
#9
41.0%
#10
35.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
68114 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE with 68.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Omaha is 32.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Nebraska is 34.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.