Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.68178100.0%33.5%(+66.5)#135.2%(+64.8)#59
2.6810287.1%33.5%(+53.7)#535.2%(+52.0)#520
3.6813173.4%33.5%(+39.9)#635.2%(+38.2)#893
4.6811160.7%33.5%(+27.3)#1235.2%(+25.5)#1,738
5.6810556.6%33.5%(+23.2)#1435.2%(+21.4)#2,142
6.6812755.3%33.5%(+21.8)#1735.2%(+20.1)#2,295
7.6810852.6%33.5%(+19.1)#2035.2%(+17.4)#2,688
8.6811451.5%33.5%(+18.0)#2135.2%(+16.3)#2,851
9.6811050.7%33.5%(+17.3)#2335.2%(+15.5)#2,982
10.6813245.0%33.5%(+11.6)#2835.2%(+9.86)#4,040
11.6813444.8%33.5%(+11.3)#2935.2%(+9.60)#4,117
12.6810643.3%33.5%(+9.86)#3435.2%(+8.13)#4,494
13.6810441.3%33.5%(+7.84)#4635.2%(+6.11)#5,019
14.6815440.0%33.5%(+6.54)#5535.2%(+4.81)#5,417
15.6810738.1%33.5%(+4.69)#6535.2%(+2.96)#6,041
16.6812437.0%33.5%(+3.57)#7135.2%(+1.84)#6,476
17.6816436.1%33.5%(+2.61)#7435.2%(+0.885)#6,874
18.6813734.8%33.5%(+1.30)#9435.2%(-0.433)#7,477
19.6814432.2%33.5%(-1.22)#11435.2%(-2.95)#8,712
20.6815731.0%33.5%(-2.50)#12935.2%(-4.23)#9,460
21.6811227.7%33.5%(-5.79)#17035.2%(-7.52)#11,626
22.6813825.1%33.5%(-8.33)#20335.2%(-10.1)#13,511
23.6815223.0%33.5%(-10.4)#24935.2%(-12.2)#15,398
24.6811721.7%33.5%(-11.7)#27735.2%(-13.4)#16,591
25.6813021.6%33.5%(-11.9)#28135.2%(-13.6)#16,761
26.6811620.4%33.5%(-13.0)#29535.2%(-14.7)#17,781
27.6811818.7%33.5%(-14.8)#32635.2%(-16.5)#19,484
28.6812218.3%33.5%(-15.1)#33335.2%(-16.8)#19,821
29.6813510.0%33.5%(-23.5)#49635.2%(-25.2)#27,342
30.681369.8%33.5%(-23.6)#49935.2%(-25.4)#27,435
31.681424.6%33.5%(-28.9)#54635.2%(-30.6)#30,229

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE are:
#1
100.0%
#2
87.1%
#3
73.4%
#4
60.7%
#5
56.6%
#6
55.3%
#7
52.6%
#8
51.5%
#9
50.7%
#10
45.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
68178 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha is 42.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.