Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,407,130 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $78,911, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $82,736, a difference of 47.7%), and median family income ($125,150 compared to $85,294, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $47,448, a difference of 20.4%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $36,424, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 77.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 70.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 69.0%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 58.1%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 100.4%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 79.2%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.3%).